Support Query
I've used Corporate Actions to process a share consolidation and it's rounded the units to the nearest whole number. How do I account for the consolidation using partial units?
Overview
Example - Adjusting an investment's units upwards
If Simple Fund 360 has understated an investment's units due to rounding, an upwards adjustment is required.
Consider a fund with the following holding before and after processing a share consolidation on a one-for-ten basis using the Corporate Actions screen:
Holding | Units | Cost-base | |
Before | Xanadu Mines Ltd | 1,242 | $2,484 |
After | Xanadu Mines Ltd | 124 (rounded down from 124.2) | $2,484 |
As the units have been understated by 0.2 units, an upwards adjustment will be made to bring the units to 124.2.
This is achieved by posting the following journal in Simple Fund 360:
Account | Units | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
---|---|---|---|
77600/Xanadu Mines Ltd | 0.2 | 0 | |
77600/Xanadu Mines Ltd | (blank) | 0 |
Example - Adjusting an investment's units downwards
If instead the units had been overstated, a downwards adjustment would be required
Consider the same corporate action as above but with the following holding:
Holding | Units | Cost-base | Unit Cost | |
Before | Xanadu Mines Ltd | 1,248 | $2,496 | $2 |
After | Xanadu Mines Ltd | 125 (rounded up from 124.8) | $2,496 | $19.968 |
The units have been overstated by 0.2 units which will require a downwards adjustment.
This will be achieved by disposing of 0.2 of the units at cost to prevent any CGT occuring.
The following journal shows this:
Account | Units | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
---|---|---|---|
77600/Xanadu Mines Ltd | (blank) | $3.99 | |
77600/Xanadu Mines Ltd | 0.2 |
= 0.2 * $19.968 ≈ $3.99 |
Ensure that no Capital Gains occur when posting this transaction:
An upwards cost-base adjustment entry will be required to bring the cost-base up:
Account | Units | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
---|---|---|---|
77600/Xanadu Mines Ltd | 0 | $3.99 | |
77600/Xanadu Mines Ltd | (blank) | $3.99 |